Reviews: The E-Blade Self Balance Board

8

In recent months, the popularity of the self-balance scooter (or the Segway hoverboard as the cool kids call them) has exploded with an array of celebs including the Biebs, Brooklyn Beckham, and even a Kardashian ditching their boots and heels for motors and wheels.

brooklyn-beckham-segway-board The eblade self-balance board is powered by two gyroscopic motors that use similar technology found in the original Segway but in a much more compact package. The inbuilt gyros maintain a level platform for the rider who controls the scooter by leaning on the smart pedal pads under each foot. The pedals are highly sensitive and require only the slightest of movements to propel the rider in any direction.

#tricks like #skateboarding plus it pushes uphill for you! #paddlingout

A post shared by eblade (@eblade_official) on

The scooters have attracted the “hoverboard” title from the public as they make the rider look like they’re floating. The effortless appearance of using the scooter only takes a few minutes to achieve as the rider becomes accustomed to the controls. Most users pick it up in around ten minutes and have it clocked in half an hour. The main thing to remember when riding is to let the scooter do all the work and try and keep your body in an upright position. Once you’ve got that thought cemented in your brain, it doesn’t take long before you’re zooming around the neighbourhood.

Eblade Smart Balance Board Specs

  • Charge time: 2-3 hours
  • Distance per charge: 25km (15.5 miles)
  • Max speed: 12km/h (7.5 mph)
  • Weight: 11kg (24 pounds)
  • Built-in Bluetooth speakers
  • Samsung lithium ion battery
  • Price: $799 AUD (561 US$ at the time* of posting)
inside of an e-blade
Inside of an E-blade: very well built with a large battery

How practical the eblade scooter will be as an alternative mode of transport remains to be seen as it may take a while before the public adopt the scooter as a legitimate form of transport. But if you take into account the growing cost of owning a car in many countries, as well as the rising costs of public transport; the eblade scooter does become a more viable and eco-friendly option. The rechargeable Samsung lithium ion batteries are capable of supporting a 25km range which means workers who live close to the city can easily commute to work and back on a single charge, reducing the amount of cars on the road and also saving on parking!

Apart from the practical side of the scooter, these things are unbelievably fun to ride, turning every road and footpath into an adventure as you cruise through the once mundane city streets. The scooter also comes with built-in Bluetooth speakers so you can pump out your favourite tunes as you cruise.

mini segway range

The eblade balance board is an absolute blast, and more practical than you think! So if you’ve got some spare cash and want a new way to get around the city why not add this to your Christmas list!

*30th September 2015

Scientists have found a new way to edit DNA

3

A FEW years in the past, molecular biologists made an enormous breakthrough. By borrowing an antiviral mechanism from bacteria, they created a simple method to tweak the genetic data inside cells – a method that had huge implications for science, medicine & agriculture. However, a dispute over who precisely invented what first has threatened to curtail its potential. But CRISPR-Cas9, as the disputed technique is known as, turns out to not be the only means bacteria defend themselves from the attentions of viruses.Recently, in Cell, a group of researchers led by Feng Zhang of the Broad Institute in Cambridge, Massachusetts, who is among the parties to the patent dispute, have announced their discovery of another such mechanism.

Like its predecessor, the new mechanism, called CRISPR-Cpf1, has the potential to turn into a tool that may deal with intractable genetic diseases such as Huntington’s, and degenerative conditions like Alzheimer’s. It may also be used to create new classes of anti-viral treatment, and thus curb infectious disease. Plant and animal breeders, as well as doctors, might find it helpful, too. They could create new strains of crops and livestock. Indeed, because, like CRISPR-Cas9, it doesn’t involve taking genes from one organism and implanting them in another, it is not going to count as “transgenic”, a bogeyman of campaigners and customers alike.

CRISPR-Cas9 consists of a molecular pair of scissors (the Cas9) and a guide sequence of DNA (the CRISPR) that tells the scissors where to chop. The dispute over who can rightfully claim inventorship has prompted some, although not all, potential companies to give the technology a wide berth. Monsanto, a plant-breeding and agrichemicals agency, has gone on record as saying that it’s reluctant to make use of CRISPR-Cas9 widely till it understands the intellectual property concerned. Drug corporations have also circled at a distance. CRISPR-Cpf1, which has a different pair of scissors, might effectively not endure these legal issues.

CRISPR-Cpf1 can also be better than CRISPR-Cas9 in other ways. Cpf1 is a smaller and less complicated enzyme (identified technically as an endonuclease) than Cas9, which suggests it is going to be simpler to deliver to the cells whose genes need modifying. And its slightly offset cuts to double-stranded DNA will help researchers to insert genetic patches more effectively and precisely.

Its discovery also raises the question of how many other endonuclease-based systems are out there in the world’s bacteria. Viral infection is a serious threat to these microbes, and the natural job of both CRISPR-Cas9 and CRISPR-Cpf1 is to recognise viral genes and chop them up before they can do any harm. Conversely, viruses are constantly evolving to escape the antiviral systems’ attentions, meaning bacteria need to generate new ones. The chances are good, therefore, that CRISPR-Cas9 and CRISPR-Cpf1 are not alone. As Dr Zhang himself puts it, “I can’t even begin to count how many there may be. There really is great diversity that we as a scientific community should go out and explore.”

edit genes
Crystal Structure of cas9 in_complex with guide rna and target dna

The tools to carry out that exploration now exist. CRISPR-Cpf1, for instance, was found not by searching in bacteria directly, but by scrutinising a published database of bacterial genetic sequences, which yielded two species that contain it. Further searches might be equally rewarding—and the more gene-editing systems are discovered, the harder it will be to monopolise their use.

Despite the optimism of those who think the new techniques may calm qualms about genetic engineering, however, some people are bound to have ethical worries—certainly when it comes to applying them to human beings. Earlier this year, for example, when Chinese scientists used CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing on a human embryo (albeit one that was unviable, and could not therefore have developed into a person) there was much brouhaha and several calls for a moratorium on this line of inquiry.

In December, therefore, a group of academic societies from America, Britain and China are hosting a meeting in Washington, DC, to thrash out some of the issues—particularly about the way in which gene editing might be used to make changes in human beings that could be inherited. On September 18th researchers in Britain applied for permission to modify human embryos genetically, as part of a study of human development. Any licence would allow the use only of embryos left over after IVF treatment, and those embryos could be studied for no more than two weeks of development. Nor could they be used to create a pregnancy, or for any other clinical application. But the direction of travel is clear.

The Washington meeting is thus timely. Scientists need to set out to politicians, and to the public at large, what gene-editing technology can now do. They could also speculate usefully about what it might mean for the future, and how best to use it. Dr Zhang is one of those who will attend. He will say that it is the responsibility of scientists and developers of the techniques to make sure that they engage the public in thoughtful discussion, and that the technology is used to best advantage.

This is a responsible attitude, and reminiscent of a meeting that happened 40 years ago in Asilomar, California, when early genetic engineers got together to explore the implications of their science. Then, they agreed a strict set of safety conditions and a self-imposed moratorium on some sorts of research that might have been dangerous, which helped to allay public fears. As more recent experience with genetically modified crops has shown, it is important to be up-front and open in this way. It would be a pity if CRISPR-based gene editing, having escaped the legal thickets, were to get tangled up in a PR disaster.

Engineers invent clear coating that boost solar cell efficiency by cooling them

2

The hotter solar cells turn out to be, the less efficient they’re at converting sunlight to electrical energy, an issue that has long vexed the solar trade. Now, Stanford engineers have developed a clear transparent overlay that will increase efficiency by cooling the cells even in full direct sunlight.

When laid over a photo voltaic cell, the clear materials shown here can radiate heat away from photo voltaic cells, allowing them to produce electricity extra efficiently.

Every time you stroll outside you emit energy into the universe: Heat from the top of your head radiates into space as infrared light.

Now three Stanford engineers have developed a technology that improves on solar panel efficiency by exploiting this basic phenomenon. Their invention shunts away the heat generated by a photo voltaic cell under sunlight and cools it in a manner that enables it to convert more photons into electrical energy.

The work by Shanhui Fan, a professor of electrical engineering at Stanford, research associate Aaswath P. Raman and doctoral candidate Linxiao Zhu is described in the current issue of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The group’s discovery, tested on a Stanford rooftop, addresses a problem that has long bedeviled the solar industry: The warmer photo voltaic cells get, the less efficient they become at converting the photons in light into useful electrical energy.

The Stanford solution relies on a thin, patterned silica material laid on top of a conventional solar cell. The material is transparent to the visible light that powers solar cells, but captures and emits thermal radiation, or heat, as infrared rays.

“Photo voltaic arrays should face the sun to perform, despite the fact that that heat is detrimental to efficiency,” Fan stated. “Our thermal overlay permits sunlight to pass through, preserving or even enhancing sunlight absorption, but it also cools the cell by radiating the heat out and improving the cell efficiency.”

A cool method to enhance solar efficiency

In 2014, the same trio of inventors developed an ultrathin material that radiated infrared heat directly back towards space with out warming the atmosphere. They presented that work in Nature, describing it as “radiative cooling” because it shunted thermal power straight into the deep, chilly void of space.

In their new paper, the researchers applied that work to improve solar array efficiency when the sun is thrashing down.

The Stanford group tested their technology on a customized solar absorber – a device that mimics the properties of a solar cell with out producing electricity – coated with a micron-scale pattern designed to maximise the capability to dump heat, in the form of infrared light, into space. Their experiments confirmed that the overlay allowed visible light to go through to the photo voltaic cells, however that it also cooled the underlying absorber by as much as 23 degrees Fahrenheit.

For a typical crystalline silicon solar cell with an efficiency of 20%, 23 F of cooling would enhance absolute cell efficiency by over 1%, a figure that represents a significant gain in power production.

The researchers said the brand new clear thermal overlays work best in dry, clear environments, that are also preferred sites for large photo voltaic arrays. They believe they’ll scale things up so commercial and industrial applications are possible, perhaps utilizing nanoprint lithography, which is a typical approach for producing nanometer-scale patterns.

“That is not necessarily the only method,” mentioned Raman, a co-first-author of the paper. “New techniques and machines for manufacturing these sorts of patterns will continue to advance. I am optimistic.”

Cooler vehicles

Zhu stated the technology has a lot of potential for any outdoor device or system that demands cooling but requires the preservation of the visible spectrum of sunlight for either practical or aesthetic reasons.

heat reflection
It works in a similar way to heat reflective glass or paint, like the one illustrated above

“Say you’ve got a car that’s bright red,” stated Zhu, co-first-author of the paper. “You actually like that colour, however you’d also wish to benefit from anything that might assist in cooling your car during scorching days. Thermal overlays will help with passive cooling, however it’s an issue if they are not absolutely transparent.”

That is because the perception of colour requires objects to reflect visible light, so any overlay would must be clear, or else tuned such that it will absorb only light outside the visible spectrum.

“Our photonic crystal thermal overlay optimizes use of the thermal portions of the electromagnetic spectrum with out affecting visible light,” Zhu said, “so you’ll be able to radiate heat effectively with out affecting colour.”

 

Deep Sweep Launched by Hackers to Spy on Drones

For governments trying to hide controversial programs from their residents, there are few better directions to transmit secret military & spy communications than straight up. Unlike here on earth, no pesky amateur radio eavesdroppers or curious hackers monitor the open sky between ground control and a drone—not to point out between that drone and its communication satellite perched even more kilometers higher up.

Deep Sweep helium
The weather balloon before launch. JULIAN OLIVER, BENGT SJÖLEN & DANJA VASILIEV

One small crew of hackers is attempting to pierce that stratospheric secrecy zone with a high-altitude flying, or floating, machine of their own. The three members of a socially motivated movement of technologists referred to as Critical Engineering have developed and begun testing an “aerospace probe” they named the Deep Sweep. The invention, described in their own detailed write-up, is a 1-foot-diameter acrylic orb full of radio tools and connected to a 2.5-foot diameter helium-filled weather balloon. As it floats up more than 24 kilometers (15 miles) into the earth’s atmosphere, the probe’s antennae are designed to record a wide range of radio data to be analyzed when the probe is recovered hours or days later. The undertaking’s objective: to pioneer a brand new type of public, crowd-sourced data collection for monitoring the communications of a secret layer of government sky machines—UAVs aka drones, satellites and high-altitude planes.

“The core aim of the project is to build a low-cost platform for high-altitude signals intelligence for the rest of us,” says Julian Oliver, a Berlin-based artist and hacker who launched the venture together with fellow creators Bengt Sjöle & Danja Vasiliev. “It’s about creating an interface to read the signals in the skies above us, to understand what’s happening up there.”

Inside Deep Sweep
Probe with hardware inside styro-foam insulation shell, mounted inside acrylic exo-shell. JULIAN OLIVER, BENGT SJÖLEN & DANJA VASILIEV

The group’s DIY probe was constructed with three software defined radios, three antennae all listening to different parts of the radio frequency spectrum, a GoPro camera, a GPS module, temperature and pressure sensors, a SIM card for communicating with the crew through SMS, and an insulated battery. All of that’s integrated with an Arduino board, a USB hub, an Intel Edison minicomputer and open-source software program. The cheap design is meant to encourage other amateurs to construct high-flying probes of their own: Oliver says the complete setup cost less than $300—although they hope to use even cheaper parts in future versions—with another $200 for the balloon plus the helium to fill it.

As a final touch, the group constructed the orb’s shell from a pair of parabolic mirrored surveillance camera covers—the sort used on the ceilings of retail stores and banks. “We thought that suited the project very nicely,” Oliver says.

To this point, the Critical Engineers have staged two test-launches of their spy balloon. Here’s the way it works: When the probe rises to an altitude of around 30 kilometers (18.6 miles), low atmospheric air pressure causes the balloon carrying it to burst (after expanding to almost 10 times its original size). Then the probe releases a nylon parachute and floats safely back to earth. Once it’s back in cell tower range, it sends a text message to its creators signaling its arrival and sharing its landing location.

The tests had mixed outcomes. Its first balloon flight from the eastern German city Frankfurt in August landed in a Polish field. When they tracked down and recovered the machine after a long, pre-dawn drive, they discovered that its energy source had failed just seven minutes into the flight, cutting short its data collection.

Their second launch later in the same month was more fruitful, despite a different set of issues: They released the balloon from Magdeburg, Germany, anticipating that it will again land in Poland. Instead, during a long interval when the probe lost cell signal, the wind pulled it more more than a 1000 kilometers (~600 miles) east, at some points dragging it through the sky as fast as 140 km/h (87 m/hr). “It was a bit of a desperate feeling,” says Oliver. “You get quite hooked up to the thing. After we finally received an SMS from it the next morning, we were very happy.”

Deep Sweep
View from the probe as it climbs into the stratosphere, overlaid with the radio frequency and power data it collects. JULIAN OLIVER, BENGT SJÖLEN & DANJA VASILIEV

The probe had landed in a cornfield close to Minsk, Belarus. Since Belarus’s dictatorship doesn’t maintain an open border with the EU, the crew needed to enlist the assistance of a buddy with Belarusian contacts to rescue it. Despite their initial suspicions that the shiny sphere’s creators were state spies rather than amateur hackers, a Belarusian couple finally retrieved the probe and offloaded its data over the Internet to Critical Engineering’s server in Sweden. (One of the two Belarusians traveled this month to Stockholm via a ferry from Estonia to deliver the probe back to its owners).

The info from that first successful test-flight, accessible here and constructed into a set of data visualizations here, is meant to be the start of a public, crowd-sourced collection. Oliver says the group plans to create a wiki for publishing the results of any future probe launches, both those by his Critical Engineering team and anybody else who launches a stratospheric radio balloon of their own.

Deep Sweep on Touchdown
Deep Sweep after its touchdown in a Belarusian cornfield. JULIAN OLIVER, BENGT SJÖLEN & DANJA VASILIEV

And just what do Deep Sweep’s creators think they’ll discover in their probe project’s potential trove of radio information? Oliver says they hope to pick up threads of conversation between government agencies and flying machines that range from Predator and Reaper drones to spy satellites like those launched by the U.S.’s secretive National Reconnaissance Office. Those radio conversations are no doubt encrypted, and Oliver says the group has no illusions that they’ll be capable of peering into the content of the communications. However they do hope they’ll ultimately have the ability to at least recognize the presence of secret sky gadgets talking to satellites overhead or the ground below, and even possibly learn to “fingerprint” and distinguish them.

Oliver hopes that the Deep Sweep project might be the start of a new amateur community of high-altitude radio fanatics who monitor the radio frequencies of the sky the same way that Ham radio hobbyists have monitored and transmitted ground-based communications for  years.

“What the Ham radio scene does here on earth…we wish to do the same thing at the fringe of space. Because that’s where a hell of a lot of really fascinating and dubious things are taking place,” says Oliver. “There’s no other way of getting to the bottom of it all than by getting up there.”

Launch Video

 

AI – Computer Learns From Mistakes – Becomes ‘Chess GrandMaster’

1

A computer program called Giraffe has taught itself to become an international grand master after playing itself for just 72 hours. The software was able to learn from its own mistakes as it played against itself and is now able to beat most humans who have spent a lifetime learning the game.

The software can play with itself and perfect the moves by detecting previous mistakes. It can also find alternative combinations for every set.

To be crowned as “Grandmaster” in chess, a player must be able to have a rating of more than 2,500. The world’s current number one player, Magnus Carlsen, was rated at 2,853.

It’s been nearly 20 years since IBM’s Deep Blue supercomputer beat the reigning world chess champion, Gary Kasparov, for the first time under standard event rules.  Since then, chess-playing computer systems have developed considerably powerful, leaving the best humans little likelihood even against a modern chess engine running on a smartphone.

Gary vs IBM
Gary Kasprov playing against Deep Blue – 1997 – Source: Reuters

However while computers have become faster, the way chess engines work has not changed. Their power depends on brute force, the process of looking through all possible future moves to seek out the most effective next one.

Of course, no human can match that or come anyplace close. While IBM’s Deep Blue was searching some 200 million positions per second, Kasparov was probably searching not more than 5 a second. And yet he performed at essentially the same level. Clearly, humans have a trick up their sleeve that computers don’t (yet).

This trick is in evaluating chess positions and narrowing down the most profitable avenues of search. That dramatically simplifies the computational process because it prunes the tree of all doable moves to only a few branches.

Computers have never been good at this, but that changes thanks to the work of Matthew Lai at Imperial College London. Lai has created an artificial intelligence machine, which he calls Giraffe that has taught itself to play chess by evaluating positions much more like humans and in a completely different technique to conventional chess engines.

Lai generated his dataset by randomly choosing 5 million positions from a database of computer chess games. He then created greater variety by adding a random legal move to each position before utilizing it for training. In total he generated a hundred and seventy five million positions in this method.

The usual way of training these machines is to manually evaluate every position and use this information to teach the machine to recognize those that are robust and those that are weak.

However this can be an enormous task for 175 million positions. It might be carried out by another chess engine but Lai’s objective was more ambitious. He wanted the machine to be taught itself.

As an alternative, he used a bootstrapping approach in which Giraffe played against itself with the aim of enhancing its prediction of its own evaluation of a future position. That works because there are fixed reference points that ultimately determine the value of a position—whether or not the match is later won, lost or drawn.

Lai says this probabilistic approach predicts the best move 46 percent of the time and places the best move in its top 3 ranking, 70 percent of the time. So the computer doesn’t have to bother with the other moves.

Robot playing chess
Source: https://www.lkessler.com/brutefor.shtml

In a report from Daily Mail, Mr. Lai admitted that his software was not as good as the best chess software.  “Giraffe is able to play at the level of an FIDE International Master on a modern mainstream PC,” says Lai. By comparison, the top engines play at super-Grandmaster level.

Source – Giraffe: Using Deep Reinforcement Learning to Play Chess 

 

A Malware Called Active VisitorTracker Campaign Infecting WordPress Sites

3

For the last couple of weeks Sucuri have been tracking a new Malware threat that has gained significant traction over the past forty eight-seventy two hours. The malware they call the “Active VisitorTracker Campaign” is fairly easy to identify because of very particular “visitorTracker_isMob” code being used.

As of the 18th September 2015, slightly over 6 million web sites now contaminated, with over 5 million of these infections occurring within the last 48 hours. The chart created by Sucuri shows the rate of infections below:

Malware rising trend by Sucuri
See the rise especially 15th September onwards – Source: Sucuri

What does the Active VisitorTracker Malware do?

Based on Sucuri, the final objective of the infection is to redirect the visitors of the website to a Nuclear Exploit Kit landing pages, which may in turn use numerous methods to infect the physical computers of these visitors. Some examples of the strategies used include infecting the visitors computer utilizing Flash, Silverlight, PDF, and Internet Explorer to install malware or ransomware.

For more detailed \ technical article on the Nuclear Exploit Kit click here.

The exploit works by inserting the following code in to your web site:

  • function visitorTracker_isMob( ) var ua = window.navigator.userAgent.toLowerCase(); if(/(androidmobile|avantgo|bada\/|blackberry|blazer|compal|elaine|fennec|hiptop|iemobile|ip(hone|od)|iris|kindle|lge |maemo|mi..|v400|v750|veri|vi(rg|te)|vk(40|5[0-3]|\-v)|vm40|voda|vulc .. |vx(52|53|60|61|70|80|81|83|85|98)|w3c(\-| )|webc|whit|wi(g |nc|nw)|wmlb|wonu|x700|yas\-|your|zeto|zte\-/i.test(ua.substr(0,4))) return true; return false; /* .. visitorTracker .. */ /*

This code will then force the visitors web page to load an iframe from one of many Nuclear Exploit Kit landing pages which then infects the visitors computer system.

An example of the exploit in action has been noted by Jerome Segura from MalwareBytes showing an infection on a web site owned by a big security provider (Coverity):

Security site effected
Source: Malwarebytes

However they aren’t the only major security firm affected by this exploit.

Sucuri itself is infected by this Malware [Update: FALSE POSTIVE]

What concerns us very deeply is that Sucuri’s own labs (dot) sucuri (dot) net (don’t visit it – we are going to update when it’s secure) website is contaminated by this very malware. Their main blog post on this very Malware links to an article on that sub-domain with additional information on the exploit.

For a security firm, it’s quite serious that they’re really directing you to click a link to a contaminated page, and we immediately reached out to them via their support site and via their live chat to let them know. At the present time we do not have a reply/see any action has been taken.

We were first alerted to the fact their website was infected by Norton Antivirus as shown beneath:

Norton says Sucuri infected
Norton says Sucuri is infected with the malware

We then followed this up by using Sucuri’s own Site Scanner Tool, which confirmed that malicious code was detected, and that the code of the infection contained the following:

  • if(visitorTracker_isMob())

while also referring to their Malware entry: MW:JS:GEN2 (we will link to the page once we confirm the malware has been eliminated).

You can see a screenshot of their infection below:

Sucuri Infected - Checked by Sucuri
Source: Sucuri

Obviously, it is extremely serious that a web site people use to find out extra info on this infection is in turn responsible for spreading the infection itself.

UPDATE:

SUCURI REPONDED: “Indeed, since we publish details about attacks and malicious code on labs.sucuri.net, this can sometimes be flagged in SiteCheck. Not a big deal, though — you can see it’s alerting about a blog post that actually discusses the malware in question.

THE CEO of SUCURI then Added:

Yes, we flagged ourselves. and it caused others, like Norton to flag us as well.. these however are false positives. We have direct lines of communication with many vendors

Many of Infected Sites already blacklisted by Google

The seriousness of this Malware cannot be understated. Not only are you opening up your Guests computers to malware/ransomware, but Google appears to be very quickly blacklisting any site affected by this exploit.

Based on Sucuri, 17% of all websites they’ve found with the exploit are already blacklisted by Google and other popular blacklists.

How to test if your Site is infected with the VisitorTracker Malware?

The simplest method to check if your website is contaminated is to use this free tool by Sucuri. (This is safe to use)

How can you protect yourself as a website visitor?

While we haven’t checked all firewalls or antivirus programs but we are able to confirm that MalwareBytes and Norton successfully prevented us from visiting a website infected with this malware.

 


 

Here is Mr Tony Perez’s (CEO of Sucuri) full response. We (GadgTecs) apologize deeply for the confusion.

Thanks for sharing our information, but I did want to let you know it is a bit misleading. We are not and have not been compromised by this infection.

As an organization we invest heavily in research, specifically the public disclosure of that research to keep communities such as this one informed. This sometimes requires us to release snippets of malware variants, such as was the case here.

Yes, we flagged ourselves.. 🙁 and it caused others, like Norton to flag us as well.. these however are false positives. We have direct lines of communication with many vendors

If you have any other questions, please let me know I’d be happy to expand on the subject if required.

Tony Perez
Sucuri – CEO

tony@sucuri.net

How To Bypass (Hack) Android 5.x (Lollipop) Lockscreen

1

A hack or a vulnerability exists in Android Lollipop 5.x (uptil 5.1.1, build LMY48L) that enables an attacker to crash and bypass the lockscreen and achieve full access to a locked machine, even when encryption is enabled on the device. It was discovered on the 25th of June, 2015 and reported (privately) to Google. Now an update to patch this vulnerability has been released, and Google has made the exploit public (CVE-2015-3860). The method detailed here has been originally taught by jgor and first published here.

By manipulating a sufficiently large string within the password field when the camera app is active an attacker is able to destabilize the lock screen, causing it to crash and go to the home screen. At this point arbitrary applications may be run or adb developer access can be enabled to gain full access to the gadget and use any of its stored data.

The exploit requires the following:

The hacker/user should have physical access to the device (duh!)

Person who own’s a phone must have a password enabled (pin / pattern configurations are not effected by this exploit)

Video proof – [Nexus 4, Android 5.1.1 (build LMY48I)]:


Steps:

emergency call

  • From the locked screen, open the EMERGENCY CALL window.

 

 

 

 

 

 

hacking android

  • Type a few characters in the dialer, e.g. 11 asterisks. Then Double-tap the characters to highlight and then tap the copy button. Then taponcein thefield and tap paste, doubling the characters in thefield (i.e. now you have 22 asterisks) Repeat this process ofhighlight all, copy, and paste untilthe field is so lengthy that double-tapping no longer highlights the field. This usually occcurs after 10 or so repetitions.

 

 

 

camera password screen

  • Return to the lockscreen, then swipe left to open the digital camera. Open the notifications from by swiping down down from the top of the screen, then select the Settings (gear) icon (top right). Now you’ll see the prompt asking you for the passwords.

 

 

 

 

  • just before crashLong-tap in the password field and select paste. Keep doing this as many times as its possible, until you notice the UI crash and the soft-buttons at the bottom of the screen disappear, expanding the camera to full screen. It may take longer than usual for the paste button to appear as you long-tap.

 

 

 

Tada! You are in. You can navigate to the Settings and enable USB debugging (so that you can use adb to root the device or do anything else you want 😉

Do mention in the comments if it worked for you, the type of device and android version you have.

Source: https://sites.utexas.edu/iso/2015/09/15/android-5-lockscreen-bypass/

Next Hacker International Programming Player Competition (IPPC)

0

Miami, September 16, 2015

Java Programmers Competition 2016 IPPC: $500,000 cash prizes

SHOW ME YOUR SPEED!

We are already convinced that there are many gifted programmers and ingenious hackers.

    Now we want to know who the fastest and most flexible are.
After all, we are in the century of speed:

TIME = $

Next Hacker: International Programming Player Competition, February 26 & 27, 2016 in Berlin, Germany, the 2016 IPPC promises an exciting two days of intriguing events and programming competitions featuring 3,000 of the world’s best up and coming developers and programmers in an extreme and exciting skill competition.

IPPC’s main event is where the true competition really begins and everyone can be a winner in the Xtrem Programming Competition Speed & Skill Challenge. $500,000.00 cash prize they await the winners. This multi-stage challenge starts with each programmer having to successfully find and fix errors in three random Java programs.  Once that phase is completed, the programmer needs to achieve a score of 150,000 points in a single Classic Pac-Man game.  Once both tasks are completed, the fastest programmers win a share of the cash pool.  In addition, contestants’ contest performance information will be made available for all Companys.

The 2016 International Programming Player Competition will also offer technical sessions on programming, an open panel discussion with renowned hackers and programmers, and the opportunity for the world’s top programmers to be exposed to and meet leading high tech companies from around the globe.  The two day IPPC is open to programmers worldwide and space is filling up rapidly. All the money from our sponsors and advertisements that will be gathered will increase the winner’s number.

About Next Hacker IPPS
Next Hacker IPPS LDT is a worldwide group of like-minded computer programmers.  Their mission is to organize and host international programming events that connect talented programmers with corporations. The team specializes in planning and producing high quality competitive programming events.

Contact Details

Email:    info@nexthacker.com
team@nexthacker.com
Website: https://www.nexthacker.com

Logo_next_hacker

nextHacker IPPC LTD
Miami- 201 South Biscayne Boulevard – USA / Athens – Prasinou Lofou, Theatre Square (Minoti) – Greece
Sofia – Business Center Evrotur 2 – Bulgaria
Tel. +30 211 2104995

Amputee Can Control and ‘Feel’ using a Robotic Arm

A brand new advanced robotic hand that’s wired directly into the brain has been successfully tested, permitting a paralysed man to “feel”.

The hand, developed by the Applied Physics Laboratory at Johns Hopkins university, is part of a research venture into advanced replacement limbs funded by the US army’s Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).

The 28 year old person, who has been paralysed for more than a decade after a spinal-cord injury, had electrodes from the prosthetic hand inserted into his sensory and motor cortexes. This allowed him to both control the hand with his ‘thoughts’ and sense when the fingers of the hand were touched individually.

Sensors in the hand detect pressure applied to any of the fingers and create electrical signals to mimic touch sensations. When blindfolded, the volunteer could determine which finger on the hand was touched with practically 100% accuracy, according to DARPA.

“At one point, instead of pressing one finger, the team decided to press two with out telling him,” DARPA program manager Justin Sanchez said. “He responded in jest asking whether somebody was trying to play a trick on him. That’s when we knew that the feelings he was perceiving through the robotic hand were near-natural.”

Sanchez added: “Prosthetic limbs that can be controlled by thoughts are showing great promise, but with out feedback from signals traveling back to the mind it can be tough to achieve the level of control needed to carry out precise movements.”

By wiring a sense of touch from a mechanical hand directly into the brain, this work shows the potential for seamless biotechnological restoration of near-natural function. We’ve completed the circuit.”

The hand and the neurotechnologies on which it relies are hoped to permit those that have lost limbs to not only gain fully functioning replacements but also the level of control that may only be provided with sensation.

Related: Brain implant controls robotic arm – with the power of thought 

Facebook is introducing the ‘Dislike’ button

Facebook is working on a “dislike” button for its posts. This was revealved by the company’s co-founder and chief Mark Zuckerberg, during a question and answer session on Tuesday.

“People have asked about the ‘dislike’ button for many years, and probably hundreds of people have asked about this, and today is a special day because today is the day that I really get to say we’re working on it, and are very close to shipping a test of it,” he stated.

The “dislike” button has been a subject of much discussion through the years.

CEO Mark Zuckerberg revealed the plans for such a button during a Q&A session on the company’s headquarters Tuesday. The thought for such a brand new feature, which the social network plans to start testing soon, has been shot down by Zuckerberg and different Facebook executives before. However moving beyond “Like” is key to growing Facebook’s ability to surface a greater variety of content folks really care about.

The centerpiece of the Facebook experience is the News Feed, the individualized stream of stories, articles, cat photos and old style status updates you see whenever you go to the social network’s web site or app. Facebook uses an algorithm to curate the News Feed, because there’s simply too much content material to show all of it in chronological order as it once did. Each time you go to the News Feed, Facebook’s algorithm kicks into gear, sorting all of the available posts from your pals, pages you’ve liked and advertisers into order based on what it thinks you’ll find most interesting.

Facebook can’t read minds (yet), so the firm can only guess as to which posts every consumer will care the most about. The News Feed algorithm takes under consideration hundreds of factors to determine its ranking, ranging from how much you tend to watch video posts to how often a person has clicked the poster’s profile photos. Plenty of it amounts to painstaking guesswork.

However clicking Like is totally different. It’s binary and unequivocal. You either Like something or you don’t. Due to this fact, it’s one of the biggest elements in News Feed’s secret sauce. Posts that get plenty of Likes from some users are positioned higher up in other users’ feeds because it’s assumed they’ll appeal to even more engagement and Likes.

That works to some extent, however it doesn’t necessarily assist Facebook meet its stated goal of “connecting the world.” After all, the 1.5 billion humans (and some dogs, cats and robots etc) using Facebook experience a variety of feelings in addition to “Like.” As the social network increasingly positions itself as a destination for news and thought-provoking conversations, “Like” grows ever more restrictive. Customers don’t want to “Like” an article about the struggles of Syrian refugees or give a thumbs up when a buddy shares that a loved one has died. Thus, Facebook’s algorithm might bury this kind of essential content material under traditional Internet catnip.
Dislike much?
It will NOT be called the ‘dislike’ button

So “Dislike,” or whatever it winds up being known as, might provide a counterbalance to that phenomenon, making it simpler for customers to signal interest in a post or story that would be awkward to “Like.” Though Zuckerberg didn’t explain precisely how a dislike button would work, it certainly won’t be framed as a way to hate on your cousin’s cat photos. Facebook already has tools that allow individuals to hide posts, people and ads that they don’t care about. “Dislike,” then, is about opening up an avenue for users to interact with interesting content that would be awkward to do anything with inside Facebook’s present framework.

“If you’re expressing something sad . . . it may not feel comfortable to ‘like’ that post, but your pals and other people need to have the ability to express that they understand,” Zuckerberg stated on Tuesday.